<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Related Posts Are Really the Optimal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:14:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Knapp</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/comment-page-1/#comment-1051839</link>
		<dc:creator>David Knapp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 05:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/#comment-1051839</guid>
		<description>I just switched related posts plugins because I don&#039;t want to have to go in to all my posts and add them.  With Microkid&#039;s Related Posts I had to do this but with Efficient Related Posts it adds the related posts automatically.  Efficient Related Posts also lets you choose from 1-10 related posts.

I am choosing 5 related posts at the moment.  I think 3 is too little.

It is interesting to see that the comments on here seem split between 3 and 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just switched related posts plugins because I don&#8217;t want to have to go in to all my posts and add them.  With Microkid&#8217;s Related Posts I had to do this but with Efficient Related Posts it adds the related posts automatically.  Efficient Related Posts also lets you choose from 1-10 related posts.</p>
<p>I am choosing 5 related posts at the moment.  I think 3 is too little.</p>
<p>It is interesting to see that the comments on here seem split between 3 and 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Pieniazek</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/comment-page-1/#comment-586991</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Pieniazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/#comment-586991</guid>
		<description>Five is clutter, three is butter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five is clutter, three is butter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 建博40个实用技巧 &#124; 精品博客</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/comment-page-1/#comment-246469</link>
		<dc:creator>建博40个实用技巧 &#124; 精品博客</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 13:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/#comment-246469</guid>
		<description>[...] 25.安装Related Enteries并考虑将相关文章的值设为3。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 25.安装Related Enteries并考虑将相关文章的值设为3。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/comment-page-1/#comment-50822</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/#comment-50822</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking about adding this plugin to my site and was also thinking about 3 as the ideal number for related links.  Too many choices starts to clutter the bottom of the post and thus increases the readability of something. On a related note, I was wondering what your thoughts are on the Technorati Tags plugin.  I currently use it on my site but am wondering what I really get out of it.  Seemed like a good idea originally but it just doesn&#039;t seem to add much value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about adding this plugin to my site and was also thinking about 3 as the ideal number for related links.  Too many choices starts to clutter the bottom of the post and thus increases the readability of something. On a related note, I was wondering what your thoughts are on the Technorati Tags plugin.  I currently use it on my site but am wondering what I really get out of it.  Seemed like a good idea originally but it just doesn&#8217;t seem to add much value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Gomoll</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/comment-page-1/#comment-50749</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Gomoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/5-related-posts-are-really-the-optimal/#comment-50749</guid>
		<description>I used to own a graphic design firm. We experimented with how many initial designs to show a client, and also settled on 3. 5 would inevitably make them want *more* designs - more variations, different colors - and 10 simply overwhelmed them. 

I feel the same when I see related links. 3 seems reasonable, manageable. If there are too many I might not bother looking at any of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to own a graphic design firm. We experimented with how many initial designs to show a client, and also settled on 3. 5 would inevitably make them want *more* designs &#8211; more variations, different colors &#8211; and 10 simply overwhelmed them. </p>
<p>I feel the same when I see related links. 3 seems reasonable, manageable. If there are too many I might not bother looking at any of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
