<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Strategy: SWOT Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:20:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david Corbin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-951133</link>
		<dc:creator>david Corbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/#comment-951133</guid>
		<description>the big challenge that we&#039;ve witnessed over the years is this: people seem to focus  on the SWOT during strategic planning, however, during the rest of the year, they focus solely on the S and O and leave out the weaknesses and threats. it&#039;s as though they want to ignore or suppress comments or observations which are &#039;negative&#039; in nature. the net result of focusing only on the S&#039;s and O&#039;s and that&#039;s what they end up with.. a So So business. 
for more on this concept see www.davidmcorbin.wordpress.com. i&#039;d love to see your  comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the big challenge that we&#8217;ve witnessed over the years is this: people seem to focus  on the SWOT during strategic planning, however, during the rest of the year, they focus solely on the S and O and leave out the weaknesses and threats. it&#8217;s as though they want to ignore or suppress comments or observations which are &#8216;negative&#8217; in nature. the net result of focusing only on the S&#8217;s and O&#8217;s and that&#8217;s what they end up with.. a So So business.<br />
for more on this concept see <a href="http://www.davidmcorbin.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidmcorbin.wordpress.com</a>. i&#8217;d love to see your  comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-878495</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 12:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/#comment-878495</guid>
		<description>Great blog 

I like to combine SWOT and Porters five forces, by doing this things like threat of new entrants become threats worth considering.  While innovation or subject matter knowledge can be a strength. 

Niches are opportunities, things like SEO skills are &quot;Also have skills&quot; for anyone operating on the web. What was once a unique skill, now SEO is a skill for all blogers. 

Strengths become things like determination, passion and unique desirable perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great blog </p>
<p>I like to combine SWOT and Porters five forces, by doing this things like threat of new entrants become threats worth considering.  While innovation or subject matter knowledge can be a strength. </p>
<p>Niches are opportunities, things like SEO skills are &#8220;Also have skills&#8221; for anyone operating on the web. What was once a unique skill, now SEO is a skill for all blogers. </p>
<p>Strengths become things like determination, passion and unique desirable perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bang Kritikus</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-757897</link>
		<dc:creator>Bang Kritikus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/#comment-757897</guid>
		<description>SWOT is one of management method that is applied in blogging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SWOT is one of management method that is applied in blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Morrison - SWOT and business skills</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-720478</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Morrison - SWOT and business skills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/#comment-720478</guid>
		<description>Interesting article.

The principles of SWOT to a blog are sound sense, a Blog after all is a form of store front.

However most writers on SWOT look at factors like Strengths and opportunities in the context of what is unique to a given individual or organisation, rather the the &#039;whole world&#039; of blogging. For example:
# exploiting a new niche
# leveraging a new service

these are only opportunities if they are a potential strength to you and others do not have an advantage over you - money, resources, skills etc. 

The more unique your offer the better you will stand the test of time - just look at the many, many SEO blog sites - all copying from others - sure in time the market will flatten out - the race is how of the 1000s can get seen by the most the fastest - 
having a USP such as SEO in a particular market or niche is a strength - as you build your name so you build your following - specialise!

Thanks for starting the debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article.</p>
<p>The principles of SWOT to a blog are sound sense, a Blog after all is a form of store front.</p>
<p>However most writers on SWOT look at factors like Strengths and opportunities in the context of what is unique to a given individual or organisation, rather the the &#8216;whole world&#8217; of blogging. For example:<br />
# exploiting a new niche<br />
# leveraging a new service</p>
<p>these are only opportunities if they are a potential strength to you and others do not have an advantage over you &#8211; money, resources, skills etc. </p>
<p>The more unique your offer the better you will stand the test of time &#8211; just look at the many, many SEO blog sites &#8211; all copying from others &#8211; sure in time the market will flatten out &#8211; the race is how of the 1000s can get seen by the most the fastest &#8211;<br />
having a USP such as SEO in a particular market or niche is a strength &#8211; as you build your name so you build your following &#8211; specialise!</p>
<p>Thanks for starting the debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ламинат</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-586143</link>
		<dc:creator>ламинат</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/blogging-strategy-swot-analysis/#comment-586143</guid>
		<description>0fThank&#039;s.4i I compleatly agree with last post.  ahw 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://skuper.ru&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ламинат&lt;/a&gt; 6a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>0fThank&#8217;s.4i I compleatly agree with last post.  ahw<br />
<a href="http://skuper.ru" rel="nofollow">ламинат</a> 6a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
