<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calculate Your Google Supplemental Index Ratio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: conversion vans</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-913122</link>
		<dc:creator>conversion vans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 18:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-913122</guid>
		<description>Obviously you want your pages to appear when people search for them. But so what if there is duplicate content because multiple pages on your sites get put in multiple categories?  Google filters the duplicates out and then displays the most relevant.  Why would this give your site a drop in rankings?  I suppose the PR would be distributed and that would lower, but I&#039;m seeing sites with very low PR&#039;s ranking very high.  And if Google can&#039;t find something in their main index they then return supplemental index results.  If not then why have a supplemental index at all?  Seems like today the supplemental index isn&#039;t really showing.  Seems like a lot of guess work.  We are using Joomla and it produces duplicate content on it&#039;s own due to design. So does WordPress.  Is Google not smart enough to figure these things out?  What can we really do about it?  Things change so fast, you &quot;fix&quot; one thing then they change and the &quot;fix&quot; is not longer valid.  Very frustrating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously you want your pages to appear when people search for them. But so what if there is duplicate content because multiple pages on your sites get put in multiple categories?  Google filters the duplicates out and then displays the most relevant.  Why would this give your site a drop in rankings?  I suppose the PR would be distributed and that would lower, but I&#8217;m seeing sites with very low PR&#8217;s ranking very high.  And if Google can&#8217;t find something in their main index they then return supplemental index results.  If not then why have a supplemental index at all?  Seems like today the supplemental index isn&#8217;t really showing.  Seems like a lot of guess work.  We are using Joomla and it produces duplicate content on it&#8217;s own due to design. So does WordPress.  Is Google not smart enough to figure these things out?  What can we really do about it?  Things change so fast, you &#8220;fix&#8221; one thing then they change and the &#8220;fix&#8221; is not longer valid.  Very frustrating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-892452</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-892452</guid>
		<description>You are a great help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a great help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-871347</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 17:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-871347</guid>
		<description>Sorry but this stuff is old and doesn&#039;t work any more. Pages that this query says is in the main index have actually been deleted via google webmaster tool and don&#039;t appear at all on the web and pages that are not in the main index according to this url are ranking very well....please ignore this suppplementasl rubbish, most seo tools don&#039;t wrk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry but this stuff is old and doesn&#8217;t work any more. Pages that this query says is in the main index have actually been deleted via google webmaster tool and don&#8217;t appear at all on the web and pages that are not in the main index according to this url are ranking very well&#8230;.please ignore this suppplementasl rubbish, most seo tools don&#8217;t wrk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iddaa</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-864411</link>
		<dc:creator>iddaa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-864411</guid>
		<description>thank you for all of this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you for all of this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diesel Tuning</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-848910</link>
		<dc:creator>Diesel Tuning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/calculate-your-google-supplemental-index-ratio/#comment-848910</guid>
		<description>Oooh, my diesel tuning website returned a ratio of 82% , might have to do something about this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oooh, my diesel tuning website returned a ratio of 82% , might have to do something about this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 18:45:35 -->
