Comments on: Copyright Law: 12 Dos and Don’ts http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:21:17 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ron http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293667 Ron Sun, 08 May 2011 19:58:23 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293667 Hi BigfootUK I have been wondering if the Copyright Crackdown is happening at this time as a prelude to the upcoming election. These rules seem to be tighter since the president got elected in Nov 2008. How do we know that this is not a response to the use of the internet to spread the truth about the agenda of the Federal Government to “Fundamentally Transform America” (For all I know, that phrase may be copyrighted.) What I am getting at, will it be illegal and punishable to cut and paste the “13 Rules For Radicals” from Saul Alinsky’s book by the same name? Someone in the democrat party may not like it when you help to expose the agenda. Pictures that appear in a newspaper or News Website can not be called private domain… The mere publishing of them makes them pubic content. What ever happened to Freedom Of Speech? Is this only an issue in the United States? I recently heard that some company has been buying the Copyright to newspaper images and is now chasing those who re-use these images as if they were the original photographer. Could this be some rich propagandist with an agenda? If the Copyright laws ONLY exempt Government criticism from Freedom Of Speech restrictions, then the rules that apply to pornography being a Free Speech issue should also be restricted… Hi BigfootUK

I have been wondering if the Copyright Crackdown is happening at this time as a prelude to the upcoming election.
These rules seem to be tighter since the president got elected in Nov 2008.

How do we know that this is not a response to the use of the internet to spread the truth about the agenda of the Federal Government to “Fundamentally Transform America” (For all I know, that phrase may be copyrighted.)

What I am getting at, will it be illegal and punishable to cut and paste the “13 Rules For Radicals” from Saul Alinsky’s
book by the same name? Someone in the democrat party may not like it when you help to expose the agenda.

Pictures that appear in a newspaper or News Website can not be
called private domain… The mere publishing of them makes them pubic content.

What ever happened to Freedom Of Speech?
Is this only an issue in the United States?
I recently heard that some company has been buying the Copyright to newspaper images and is now chasing those
who re-use these images as if they were the original photographer.
Could this be some rich propagandist with an agenda?

If the Copyright laws ONLY exempt Government criticism from Freedom Of Speech restrictions, then the rules that apply to pornography being a Free Speech issue should also be restricted…

]]> By: Ron http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293665 Ron Sun, 08 May 2011 19:49:39 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1293665 Hi Jason, I have been wondering if the Copyright Crackdown is happening at this time as a prelude to the upcoming election. These rules seem to be tighter since the president got elected in Nov 2008. How do we know that this is not a response to the use of the internet to spread the truth about the agenda of the Federal Government to "Fundamentally Transform America" (For all I know, that phrase may be copyrighted.) What I am getting at, will it be illegal and punishable to cut and paste the "13 Rules For Radicals" from Saul Alinsky's book by the same name? Someone in the democrat party may not like it when you help to expose the agenda. Pictures that appear in a newspaper or News Website can not be called private domain... The mere publishing of them makes them pubic content. What ever happened to Freedom Of Speech? If the Copyright laws ONLY exempt Government criticism from Freedom Of Speech restrictions, then the rules that apply to pornography being a Free Speech issue should also be restricted... Hi Jason,

I have been wondering if the Copyright Crackdown is happening at this time as a prelude to the upcoming election.
These rules seem to be tighter since the president got elected in Nov 2008.

How do we know that this is not a response to the use of the internet to spread the truth about the agenda of the Federal Government to “Fundamentally Transform America” (For all I know, that phrase may be copyrighted.)

What I am getting at, will it be illegal and punishable to cut and paste the “13 Rules For Radicals” from Saul Alinsky’s
book by the same name? Someone in the democrat party may not like it when you help to expose the agenda.

Pictures that appear in a newspaper or News Website can not be
called private domain… The mere publishing of them makes them pubic content.

What ever happened to Freedom Of Speech?

If the Copyright laws ONLY exempt Government criticism from Freedom Of Speech restrictions, then the rules that apply to pornography being a Free Speech issue should also be restricted…

]]> By: Orcus http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1291632 Orcus Fri, 01 Apr 2011 23:27:23 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1291632 Actually, no. Copyright laws should be abolished. They are anti-competitive in nature (try making a show with a similar premise to Star Gate and watch how quickly you get shut down) and do more harm then good. Fact of the matter is, with globalisation a very real fact, and with populations spiking, a global financial recession, and poverty in third world countries worse then ever, with the all-mighty American government policing the world and spending more money on military then it ever has before, there is no longer a need for money. For capitalism. The way the world functions would not change if we removed money. Period. Except EVERYONE would be able to work, would have a job, except those who physically cant. Theft, murder, these crimes would significantly be reduced in number because a large amount of them are driven by material gain. Actually, no. Copyright laws should be abolished. They are anti-competitive in nature (try making a show with a similar premise to Star Gate and watch how quickly you get shut down) and do more harm then good.
Fact of the matter is, with globalisation a very real fact, and with populations spiking, a global financial recession, and poverty in third world countries worse then ever, with the all-mighty American government policing the world and spending more money on military then it ever has before, there is no longer a need for money. For capitalism.
The way the world functions would not change if we removed money. Period. Except EVERYONE would be able to work, would have a job, except those who physically cant.
Theft, murder, these crimes would significantly be reduced in number because a large amount of them are driven by material gain.

]]> By: medyum http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1290236 medyum Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:46:15 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1290236 Yes, I agree with this. A lot of my competitors stolen my content before it was crawled by Google. The most times they were crawled first, so Google thought always I was the one with duplicat content, sometimes it is so annoying me. Yes, I agree with this. A lot of my competitors stolen my content before it was crawled by Google. The most times they were crawled first, so Google thought always I was the one with duplicat content, sometimes it is so annoying me.

]]> By: BigfootUK http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1281845 BigfootUK Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:04:04 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/copyright-law-12-dos-and-donts/#comment-1281845 It sounds like to me you can't repeat anything that has been posted anywhere just incase you get sued. So unless you are creating something brand new you will unboubtably get sued. So who has copyright over the English language can they sue me for printing these words on the internet, or will your site get sued. Can i claim copyright over the content i am adding to your site now or do you now own this? What about RSS feeds are we not breaking copyright laws buy using a feed reader? the whole copyright this is just insane and I obviously just dont 'get it' sorry rant over It sounds like to me you can’t repeat anything that has been posted anywhere just incase you get sued. So unless you are creating something brand new you will unboubtably get sued.
So who has copyright over the English language can they sue me for printing these words on the internet, or will your site get sued.
Can i claim copyright over the content i am adding to your site now or do you now own this?
What about RSS feeds are we not breaking copyright laws buy using a feed reader?
the whole copyright this is just insane and I obviously just dont ‘get it’

sorry rant over

]]>