<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Changed How It Handles Nofollow (And How It Might Affect Blogs)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:43:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cristian</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1060259</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 13:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4044#comment-1060259</guid>
		<description>If a comment doesn&#039;t enrich that particular blog post, why even approve it, in the first place? 

I mean, a comment that adds value to a blog entry doesn&#039;t deserve the editorial trust translated in a dofollow link?  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://trafficcpanel.com/848/pagerank-insites-that-seo-marketers-must-know-and-apply/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PageRank isn&#039;t lost&lt;/a&gt; in the linking out process. At least not at that degree that your blog faces PR bankruptcy. I see it more like a passed PR.

Thanks for the disqus heads up! Though I&#039;m not sure I&#039;ll use any time soon :).

Cheers,
Cristian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a comment doesn&#8217;t enrich that particular blog post, why even approve it, in the first place? </p>
<p>I mean, a comment that adds value to a blog entry doesn&#8217;t deserve the editorial trust translated in a dofollow link?  </p>
<p><a href="http://trafficcpanel.com/848/pagerank-insites-that-seo-marketers-must-know-and-apply/" rel="nofollow">PageRank isn&#8217;t lost</a> in the linking out process. At least not at that degree that your blog faces PR bankruptcy. I see it more like a passed PR.</p>
<p>Thanks for the disqus heads up! Though I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll use any time soon <img src='http://www.dailyblogtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Cristian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best of Daily Blog Tips in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-1037155</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best of Daily Blog Tips in 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4044#comment-1037155</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Changed How It Handles Nofollow (And How It Might Affect Blogs): In reality this change happened over one year ago, but only recently it surfaced. Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s Web Spam team, talked about it in the latest SMX event, and soon afterward the whole SEO sphere was commenting. He also wrote a post explaining the whole issue, titled PageRank Sculpting. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Changed How It Handles Nofollow (And How It Might Affect Blogs): In reality this change happened over one year ago, but only recently it surfaced. Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s Web Spam team, talked about it in the latest SMX event, and soon afterward the whole SEO sphere was commenting. He also wrote a post explaining the whole issue, titled PageRank Sculpting. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-950365</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4044#comment-950365</guid>
		<description>While some may not be happy with the change, it is essential for Google to implement some changes. As the web sites/blogs change and people find different ways of trying to &quot;beat the system&quot; Google must do what it can to protect it&#039;s search results.

I try not to concern myself too much with PageRank. I usually just let PageRank happen as it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While some may not be happy with the change, it is essential for Google to implement some changes. As the web sites/blogs change and people find different ways of trying to &#8220;beat the system&#8221; Google must do what it can to protect it&#8217;s search results.</p>
<p>I try not to concern myself too much with PageRank. I usually just let PageRank happen as it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zerrin egeliler</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-932248</link>
		<dc:creator>zerrin egeliler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 16:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4044#comment-932248</guid>
		<description>I just knew about it and it is quite confusing for me in improving a page rank, but I think I would do more comment writing to other blogs I like often. Thanks Daniel for the clear description regarding this issue. Wait for the next update:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just knew about it and it is quite confusing for me in improving a page rank, but I think I would do more comment writing to other blogs I like often. Thanks Daniel for the clear description regarding this issue. Wait for the next update:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-changed-how-it-handles-nofollow-and-how-it-might-affect-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-930049</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 09:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4044#comment-930049</guid>
		<description>I think the change is good. It&#039;s a good way to deter bloggers trying to have the penny and the bun.

If a page has a link on it, surely it should be giving some credit to the page it&#039;s going to? If not, it&#039;s clearly a paid for link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the change is good. It&#8217;s a good way to deter bloggers trying to have the penny and the bun.</p>
<p>If a page has a link on it, surely it should be giving some credit to the page it&#8217;s going to? If not, it&#8217;s clearly a paid for link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
