<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Ranking Scraped Material on Top?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Leventer</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-582213</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Leventer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-582213</guid>
		<description>Referring to Andy Beal&#039;s post above, you can find Google&#039;s article about scraping sites and DMCA reporting here, http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=66359 . Google also refers you to their Webmaster&#039;s Discussion Forum. I haven&#039;t tried this so I don&#039;t know if they respond well there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to Andy Beal&#8217;s post above, you can find Google&#8217;s article about scraping sites and DMCA reporting here, <a href="http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=66359" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&#038;answer=66359</a> . Google also refers you to their Webmaster&#8217;s Discussion Forum. I haven&#8217;t tried this so I don&#8217;t know if they respond well there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Urban Commuter</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-576650</link>
		<dc:creator>Urban Commuter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-576650</guid>
		<description>It is happening to me. My site has been successful in its niche, and now the quality posts I make, and take hours, even days to refine and create, are instantly stolen and posted on a scraper site under their name. 

The whole thing is really messed up, and Google have lost control of it.

You would think it is VERY EASY to define the original content of word for word copyright infringement: Simply include in Google’s algorithm WHICH ONE WAS PUBLISHED FIRST!  FFS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is happening to me. My site has been successful in its niche, and now the quality posts I make, and take hours, even days to refine and create, are instantly stolen and posted on a scraper site under their name. </p>
<p>The whole thing is really messed up, and Google have lost control of it.</p>
<p>You would think it is VERY EASY to define the original content of word for word copyright infringement: Simply include in Google’s algorithm WHICH ONE WAS PUBLISHED FIRST!  FFS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-214592</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-214592</guid>
		<description>What you are witnessing is the Achilles Heel of Google and all search engines --they do NOT have the ability to determine content&#039;s original owner.

This has always been the case, but it only became readily apparent when RSS feeds began to dominate the scene. Feeds give spammers an easy way to rip your content.

See that orange &quot;Feed&quot; button up in your browser bar? That&#039;s a big flashing sign that says &quot;Please Steal My Stuff.&quot;

It&#039;s a very sad situation, but it won&#039;t be changing any time soon. Machines are only so smart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you are witnessing is the Achilles Heel of Google and all search engines &#8211;they do NOT have the ability to determine content&#8217;s original owner.</p>
<p>This has always been the case, but it only became readily apparent when RSS feeds began to dominate the scene. Feeds give spammers an easy way to rip your content.</p>
<p>See that orange &#8220;Feed&#8221; button up in your browser bar? That&#8217;s a big flashing sign that says &#8220;Please Steal My Stuff.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a very sad situation, but it won&#8217;t be changing any time soon. Machines are only so smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Roedl On Wordpress Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-188807</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Roedl On Wordpress Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 21:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-188807</guid>
		<description>[...] A couple of weeks ago I wrote an article titled &#8220;Google Ranking Scraped Material on Top?,&#8221; where I described that for very narrow search terms Google was ranking splogs and content scrapers before the original content. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of weeks ago I wrote an article titled &#8220;Google Ranking Scraped Material on Top?,&#8221; where I described that for very narrow search terms Google was ranking splogs and content scrapers before the original content. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-184330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/google-ranking-scrapped-material-on-top/#comment-184330</guid>
		<description>Sadly, this isn&#039;t the worst that Google has done in this area. In some cases, the authorized content ranks dead last or not at all:

http://www.attributor.com/morenews6.php

Google has a very serious problem here and they are in denial about it. This could, down the road, cost them dearly with their devoted searchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, this isn&#8217;t the worst that Google has done in this area. In some cases, the authorized content ranks dead last or not at all:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.attributor.com/morenews6.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.attributor.com/morenews6.php</a></p>
<p>Google has a very serious problem here and they are in denial about it. This could, down the road, cost them dearly with their devoted searchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 17:02:01 -->
