<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linking Out Will NOT Reduce The Google PageRank of Your Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 10:42:09 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dean343</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/comment-page-2/#comment-1059647</link>
		<dc:creator>dean343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4923#comment-1059647</guid>
		<description>can someone clear this up for me then beacause my understandiing is the reason reciprical links carry less weight is that by linking back you are passing back some of the page rank gained?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can someone clear this up for me then beacause my understandiing is the reason reciprical links carry less weight is that by linking back you are passing back some of the page rank gained?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scheng1</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/comment-page-2/#comment-1053296</link>
		<dc:creator>scheng1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 08:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4923#comment-1053296</guid>
		<description>I have never believed that linking out can hurt the pagerank, unless the purpose of linking out is for affiliate marketing purpose.  In that case, putting a nofollow tag solves the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never believed that linking out can hurt the pagerank, unless the purpose of linking out is for affiliate marketing purpose.  In that case, putting a nofollow tag solves the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac &#124; GoBlogger</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/comment-page-2/#comment-1049824</link>
		<dc:creator>Isaac &#124; GoBlogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 07:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4923#comment-1049824</guid>
		<description>I remembered reading something like &quot;A webmaster cannot control other people who link to him, but he can control where he links to. That&#039;s how Google judge you, by where you link. You link to bad sites, you bad.&quot; I forgot where I read it.

What do you think about it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered reading something like &#8220;A webmaster cannot control other people who link to him, but he can control where he links to. That&#8217;s how Google judge you, by where you link. You link to bad sites, you bad.&#8221; I forgot where I read it.</p>
<p>What do you think about it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Deck</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/comment-page-2/#comment-1032977</link>
		<dc:creator>James Deck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4923#comment-1032977</guid>
		<description>Thanks Daniel, great post. I especially like the &quot;bucket diagram.&quot;

One point for clarification, however. Given that:

&quot;The value of each link is equal to the PageRank of the page where they come from divided by the total number of outgoing links on that page&quot;

Should bloggers bear this in mind when deciding how frequently and who to link to?

For example, some blogs will link to every single company mentioned, to Wiki, etc. etc. whereas other blogs will only link to two or three companies, obviously to encourage traffic to those blessed few links.

These people are also distributing their PageRank influence differently, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Daniel, great post. I especially like the &#8220;bucket diagram.&#8221;</p>
<p>One point for clarification, however. Given that:</p>
<p>&#8220;The value of each link is equal to the PageRank of the page where they come from divided by the total number of outgoing links on that page&#8221;</p>
<p>Should bloggers bear this in mind when deciding how frequently and who to link to?</p>
<p>For example, some blogs will link to every single company mentioned, to Wiki, etc. etc. whereas other blogs will only link to two or three companies, obviously to encourage traffic to those blessed few links.</p>
<p>These people are also distributing their PageRank influence differently, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/linking-out-google-pagerank/comment-page-2/#comment-1032070</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 19:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4923#comment-1032070</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting debate. I have seemed a site with no external link achieving top search result for three keywords. Perhaps we should just built such website as much as possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting debate. I have seemed a site with no external link achieving top search result for three keywords. Perhaps we should just built such website as much as possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
