<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MyWebDownload.com: Download the World Wide Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:46:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Claudiu Constantin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/comment-page-1/#comment-935399</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudiu Constantin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=3623#comment-935399</guid>
		<description>Wow!
This is really something... huuge! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!<br />
This is really something&#8230; huuge! <img src='http://www.dailyblogtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: medyum</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/comment-page-1/#comment-915234</link>
		<dc:creator>medyum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=3623#comment-915234</guid>
		<description>The DVD’s would probably run into a lot of copyright issues because they would essentially be reprinting / selling other people’s content.

The downloads of course could be structured as a software program, but if it is only pulling from their cached servers, I would think a lawyer could argue they are just reprinting content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The DVD’s would probably run into a lot of copyright issues because they would essentially be reprinting / selling other people’s content.</p>
<p>The downloads of course could be structured as a software program, but if it is only pulling from their cached servers, I would think a lawyer could argue they are just reprinting content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZK@WebTrafficROI.com</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/comment-page-1/#comment-831783</link>
		<dc:creator>ZK@WebTrafficROI.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=3623#comment-831783</guid>
		<description>Certainly this one is a nice concept but what is the benefit of this. I mean people do not have the time and that&#039;s why you skip all those press releases. 

So if they able to provide such kind of information which is beneficial to us ... like sorting out internet as per our desire than this will be more logical and nice idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly this one is a nice concept but what is the benefit of this. I mean people do not have the time and that&#8217;s why you skip all those press releases. </p>
<p>So if they able to provide such kind of information which is beneficial to us &#8230; like sorting out internet as per our desire than this will be more logical and nice idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SB</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/comment-page-1/#comment-830269</link>
		<dc:creator>SB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=3623#comment-830269</guid>
		<description>I came to this late, but I laughed anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came to this late, but I laughed anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenin Nair</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/mywebdownloadcom-download-the-world-wide-web/comment-page-1/#comment-827781</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenin Nair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=3623#comment-827781</guid>
		<description>This is utterly ridiculous. 

1: The web is far more than their estimated few TBs. There aren&#039;t so called 90 per cent of porno and video sites. Also, unindexed content is quite a lot in Web.

2. Most websites publish content on practically daily basis. And these guys update their files in a month. Are we supposed to download these TBs full of data by keeping the connection open for let&#039;s say a week, and then read all outdated news and blog articles, while TBs after TBs of unwanted data resides on your HDD, only to download all 28 new files the next month?

3. It takes too much of your resources that you will feel dial up browsing is better.

4. It&#039;s utterly unecessary and there is no point in it.

5. What about videos? Obviously you want to watch them, and while you could watch them online, you would be downloading this junk.

6. What about other files? Such as utility software etc., you can download? That takes well more than TBs. If the package includes them all, then its still wastage of space. If it doesn&#039;t then you still have to go online to download any required software....

7. Practically this charade doesn&#039;t strip u off the need to go online, as you still need to, to check daily updates of BBC, your blogs, your mail, and hell a lot more...

I don&#039;t remember of other things, but this is toooooo much of a wastage of a service. And see that service has got no alexa rank, and it still has pretty much traffic, that it says about 1 million people are downloading RIGHT NOW...


Hehe. Thats the points that make a good post for a nice FOOLS&#039; DAY, DANIEL. You may want to check out my post too... at my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is utterly ridiculous. </p>
<p>1: The web is far more than their estimated few TBs. There aren&#8217;t so called 90 per cent of porno and video sites. Also, unindexed content is quite a lot in Web.</p>
<p>2. Most websites publish content on practically daily basis. And these guys update their files in a month. Are we supposed to download these TBs full of data by keeping the connection open for let&#8217;s say a week, and then read all outdated news and blog articles, while TBs after TBs of unwanted data resides on your HDD, only to download all 28 new files the next month?</p>
<p>3. It takes too much of your resources that you will feel dial up browsing is better.</p>
<p>4. It&#8217;s utterly unecessary and there is no point in it.</p>
<p>5. What about videos? Obviously you want to watch them, and while you could watch them online, you would be downloading this junk.</p>
<p>6. What about other files? Such as utility software etc., you can download? That takes well more than TBs. If the package includes them all, then its still wastage of space. If it doesn&#8217;t then you still have to go online to download any required software&#8230;.</p>
<p>7. Practically this charade doesn&#8217;t strip u off the need to go online, as you still need to, to check daily updates of BBC, your blogs, your mail, and hell a lot more&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember of other things, but this is toooooo much of a wastage of a service. And see that service has got no alexa rank, and it still has pretty much traffic, that it says about 1 million people are downloading RIGHT NOW&#8230;</p>
<p>Hehe. Thats the points that make a good post for a nice FOOLS&#8217; DAY, DANIEL. You may want to check out my post too&#8230; at my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
