NoFollow Feedburner Feed Links?

Inserting the rel=’nofollow’ tag within links will inform Google and other search engines that they should not follow that link (i.e. not sharing the link love). Most of the times using this attribute is a bad idea because it will remove the value of external links, like in the Wikipedia case.

What about the links pointing to your Feedburner feed (http://feeds.feedburner.com/yourfeed)? Feedburner provides an outstanding service and they do deserve recognition, but could a rel=’nofollow’ tag on those links have some benefits?

First of all many blogs have their Feedburner feed page ranking higher on search engines than the blog itself for most keywords. This is not optimal since a potential reader might end up visiting the feed page and not visiting the blog at all.

Secondly, provided you publish full feeds, the Feedburner feed page will also have the same content of your Homepage, possibly resulting on duplicate content penalties.

Inserting a nofollow tag on the feed links could resolve the first problem and improve the second one, specially if your feed links are sitewide and your blog has a high Pagerank.

Update: Marketing Pilgrim has a post with more suggestions for this issue.

Got the Daily Blog Tips Newsletter?

  • Tips and tricks to improve your site
  • The latest trends and opportunities
  • Useful online tools
  • It's free!

20 Responses to “NoFollow Feedburner Feed Links?”

  1. menghua on April 10th, 2007 8:28 am

    Akismet missed this spam comment above huh? LoL.. It would be great if you can provide instructions to insert a nofollow tag in feed links~ I don’t really know how to make it.. :)

  2. Daniel on April 10th, 2007 8:54 am

    menghua, sorry maybe the post was not clear. My argument is about inserting the nofollow tag on the links that are on your site pointing to the feedburner feed page (http://feeds.feedburner.com/yourblog).

  3. Mr.Byte on April 10th, 2007 9:28 am

    Yeah, I was wondering about it lately as there were too many pageviews of my feedburner through browsers that RSS readers. I think its because of search engine hits.

  4. Daniel on April 10th, 2007 10:06 am

    Mr. Byte, that is exactly the point. Try implementing the nofollow and monitor the page hits on your feed page from search engines.

    If those visitors from Google were visiting your site instead of the feed page they would have more chances of becoming regular readers (provided you have good design, easy navigation, etc.).

  5. Abdussamad Abdurrazzaq on April 10th, 2007 2:53 pm

    Why do you even use feedburner? Why not stick to just link to your wordpress feed instead of handing over your hard earned subscribers to an outside party.

  6. Daniel on April 10th, 2007 2:58 pm

    Abdussamad, here is why I think Feedburner is a must-have tool:

    -statistics: it would be impossible to drive a car without a dashboard. Same goes for a blog. Monitoring your RSS subscribers is important to see what you are doing wrong, right, what promotion techniques are worth are so for.

    -more friendly feed: an xml feed is a mess, the average Joe will click there and have no clue what to do with it. Feedburner offer a nice interface that might help readers to conclude the subscription process.

    -add ons: feedburner allows you to add email subscription, feed flares, advertising on your feed, etc.

  7. Andy Beard on April 10th, 2007 3:21 pm

    Daniel I don’t see a problem with this, especially if you are smart and have the majority of links from your feed leading back to your content using lots of related post, category and tag links.

    Where there is a problem is links to forms, such as subscription buttons and bookmark buttons.

  8. Daniel on April 11th, 2007 2:58 pm

    Andy, your solution ensures that readers visiting your feed page will bounce back to your blog. What about the duplicate issue?

  9. Andy Beard on April 11th, 2007 3:08 pm

    If you are really worried about that then you shouldn’t offer a feed and ping all those RSS aggregation sites.

    You do have links in your content back to the original source don’t you?

    It takes the time for discovery plus about 7 days for Google to give some weight for link attribution, but they normally do quite a good job of it.

  10. Bes on April 12th, 2007 7:22 am

    So far, with the logic that you explained, it seems safe to use a nofollow index on Feedburner links.

    Now, here is a question: is there any search engine out there [maybe Google Blogs Search?] that searches for feeds? If so, would they follow the nofollow rule and not index anything?

  11. Ashish Mohta on April 12th, 2007 7:45 am

    Daneil thats a good idea. I have seen in feedburner , there is an option where you can simply turn off the indexing of your feed. What do you think will it help ?

  12. Ashish Mohta on April 12th, 2007 7:46 am

    One more thing, Feed keeps on changing and so the posts will eventually disappear from the feedpage, giving new content all the time.

    Moreover When you go the feedpage, it shows excerpt not full content….Any ideas?

  13. Daniel on April 12th, 2007 7:52 am

    Ashish, if you are using partial feed this should not be a problem. I am testing with the noIndex feature on Feedburner as well to see if it will help.

  14. Mr.Byte on April 12th, 2007 9:11 pm

    @ Dnaiel or Ashish, any idea how long will it take to effect after noindex been set for the feeds?

  15. Valentin on November 28th, 2008 7:39 pm

    Where can I put the nofollow on feed. I don“t find this option
    thanks

  16. Bang Kritikus on January 28th, 2009 9:19 am

    How to insert nofollow to my feed

Got something to say?





Sponsors

Why I recommend Doreo Hosting Flex Theme for WordPress Content rich web directory Ghost Writing Services Online Invoicing For Freelancers advertise here

Recent Articles