<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Discussion: Are Mini Niche Websites Dying?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:50:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Todo</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/#comment-1288824</link>
		<dc:creator>Todo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=2122#comment-1288824</guid>
		<description>I think that getting the web monopolized is not good on first place for Google, except if the big G plans to make just few websites that dominate the web market and after that to buy each of them :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that getting the web monopolized is not good on first place for Google, except if the big G plans to make just few websites that dominate the web market and after that to buy each of them <img src='http://www.dailyblogtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/#comment-1245358</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=2122#comment-1245358</guid>
		<description>I think every market will be differnt, some markets a large site will be better and others a small targeted quality niche site will work. We own both, a large on much larger then dailyblogtips and it has its advantages, but there are some markets where our niche sites can take our any large competitor. (we just pushed about.com out of many of their top spots with our niche sites)

So it depends, get of the computer and sit down and brainstorm what you as a customer/visitor want/need/expect, its pretty basic so keep it simple. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think every market will be differnt, some markets a large site will be better and others a small targeted quality niche site will work. We own both, a large on much larger then dailyblogtips and it has its advantages, but there are some markets where our niche sites can take our any large competitor. (we just pushed about.com out of many of their top spots with our niche sites)</p>
<p>So it depends, get of the computer and sit down and brainstorm what you as a customer/visitor want/need/expect, its pretty basic so keep it simple. <img src='http://www.dailyblogtips.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mini Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/#comment-1193369</link>
		<dc:creator>Mini Websites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 00:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=2122#comment-1193369</guid>
		<description>It is a frustrating trend to see so many blackhole websites, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s the end of mini sites by any stretch of the imagination.  I think it only changes the way mini sites are used and how the overall network of sites is going to be structured.

I can tell you we build a ton of mini websites for a variety of clients and they are far from dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a frustrating trend to see so many blackhole websites, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the end of mini sites by any stretch of the imagination.  I think it only changes the way mini sites are used and how the overall network of sites is going to be structured.</p>
<p>I can tell you we build a ton of mini websites for a variety of clients and they are far from dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ayman</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/#comment-894725</link>
		<dc:creator>ayman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=2122#comment-894725</guid>
		<description>good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unternehmensberatung</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/open-discussion-are-mini-niche-websites-dying/#comment-702594</link>
		<dc:creator>Unternehmensberatung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=2122#comment-702594</guid>
		<description>Very nice article. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice article. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 199/200 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 18:28:58 -->
