Comments on: Link Tips: 03 June 2007 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/ Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:30:49 -0500 hourly 1 By: Patrix http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-38148 Patrix Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:53:48 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/#comment-38148 Thanks, Daniel for clearing that up. I've adjusted my robots.txt file and hope I haven't caused any permanent damage to my site ranking :) Thanks, Daniel for clearing that up. I’ve adjusted my robots.txt file and hope I haven’t caused any permanent damage to my site ranking :)

]]> By: Daniel http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-38138 Daniel Sun, 03 Jun 2007 21:09:21 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/#comment-38138 "However, some sites advise having only one source of content i.e. at single post page" In my opinion the excerpts from the yearly archives are not considered a source of content. There is no duplication there. Also bear in mind the archives page will display several excerpts grouped together, so the overall page is a lot different from the single post page. "So wouldn’t it be necessary to remove all old URLs from Google index and instead have it crawl the new ones?" If the 301's are in place and working properly, there is no need to remove those URL's from the Google index. Actually it could even be bad idea as currently the PR of those pages are passing through the new ones through the 301. “However, some sites advise having only one source of content i.e. at single post page”

In my opinion the excerpts from the yearly archives are not considered a source of content. There is no duplication there. Also bear in mind the archives page will display several excerpts grouped together, so the overall page is a lot different from the single post page.

“So wouldn’t it be necessary to remove all old URLs from Google index and instead have it crawl the new ones?”

If the 301’s are in place and working properly, there is no need to remove those URL’s from the Google index. Actually it could even be bad idea as currently the PR of those pages are passing through the new ones through the 301.

]]> By: Patrix http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-38118 Patrix Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:24:46 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/#comment-38118 Thanks, Daniel. I remember reading your post excerpts posts and have implemented the changes. However, some sites advise having only one source of content i.e. at single post page I recently changed my URL structure from /year/month/day/post-name to /post-name (using 301 Permalink Redirect). So wouldn't it be necessary to remove all old URLs from Google index and instead have it crawl the new ones? Thanks, Daniel. I remember reading your post excerpts posts and have implemented the changes. However, some sites advise having only one source of content i.e. at single post page

I recently changed my URL structure from /year/month/day/post-name to /post-name (using 301 Permalink Redirect). So wouldn’t it be necessary to remove all old URLs from Google index and instead have it crawl the new ones?

]]> By: Daniel http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-38115 Daniel Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:18:53 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/#comment-38115 Patrix, that is not neccesary, provided your yearly archives are only displaying post excerpts (as they should). Check this: http://www.dailyblogtips.com/use-post-excerpts-everywhere/ Patrix, that is not neccesary, provided your yearly archives are only displaying post excerpts (as they should).

Check this:
http://www.dailyblogtips.com/u.....verywhere/

]]> By: Patrix http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-38110 Patrix Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:10:49 +0000 http://www.dailyblogtips.com/reader-tips-03-june-2007/#comment-38110 Should you disallow search bots from crawling yearly archives (/2006, /2007, etc.) in the sitemap if your URL is domain.com/post-name to avoid duplication? Should you disallow search bots from crawling yearly archives (/2006, /2007, etc.) in the sitemap if your URL is domain.com/post-name to avoid duplication?

]]>