<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Engine Ranking Factors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:21:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-637675</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 02:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-637675</guid>
		<description>maybe the heading is also the very important factors, the search engine also give it the extra weight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe the heading is also the very important factors, the search engine also give it the extra weight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO дзен &#124; Факторы, которые оценивает поисковый робот</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-564070</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO дзен &#124; Факторы, которые оценивает поисковый робот</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-564070</guid>
		<description>[...] Оригинал статьи [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Оригинал статьи [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebConfs</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-74425</link>
		<dc:creator>WebConfs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-74425</guid>
		<description>[...] Можем да се направи сравнение с избора на SEOMOZ за позитивни и негативни фактори при позициониране : [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Можем да се направи сравнение с избора на SEOMOZ за позитивни и негативни фактори при позициониране : [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-10737</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 04:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-10737</guid>
		<description>Yes, I think Google must account for syndication. It wouldn&#039;t make any sense for it not to. 

Bes - About your question - some titles with same words - no worries. As long as SOMETHING is different you&#039;re fine. Actually it will increase the importance of the repeated phrase in Google because it&#039;s paired with a unique word combination. I use this in SEO and it works well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I think Google must account for syndication. It wouldn&#8217;t make any sense for it not to. </p>
<p>Bes &#8211; About your question &#8211; some titles with same words &#8211; no worries. As long as SOMETHING is different you&#8217;re fine. Actually it will increase the importance of the repeated phrase in Google because it&#8217;s paired with a unique word combination. I use this in SEO and it works well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bes</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-10562</link>
		<dc:creator>Bes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 21:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/search-engine-ranking-factors/#comment-10562</guid>
		<description>Good points. I have a question Daniel:

Do you think SER is hurt if the title/meta tags on different pages contain some keywords that are the same? For example, if one page says &quot;About - on Daily Blog Tips&quot; and another one says &quot;Contact - on Daily Blog Tips&quot;, would the repetition of the keywords &quot;Daily Blog Tips&quot; hurt SER, even though the beginning word on the two pages is different?

Thanks.

Also, Vern, regarding feedburner feeds, I assume Google knows that having a feed does not mean you are posting twice. The reason I assume this is because Google itself has Google Reader and offers feeds on its own Google blogs including blogspot, so most probably they know people will have rss feeds also that should not be counted as duplicate content that should be punished/penalized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. I have a question Daniel:</p>
<p>Do you think SER is hurt if the title/meta tags on different pages contain some keywords that are the same? For example, if one page says &#8220;About &#8211; on Daily Blog Tips&#8221; and another one says &#8220;Contact &#8211; on Daily Blog Tips&#8221;, would the repetition of the keywords &#8220;Daily Blog Tips&#8221; hurt SER, even though the beginning word on the two pages is different?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
<p>Also, Vern, regarding feedburner feeds, I assume Google knows that having a feed does not mean you are posting twice. The reason I assume this is because Google itself has Google Reader and offers feeds on its own Google blogs including blogspot, so most probably they know people will have rss feeds also that should not be counted as duplicate content that should be punished/penalized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 10:50:59 -->
