<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should We Remove the Timestamp?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:21:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: crisn</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-1289836</link>
		<dc:creator>crisn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 12:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-1289836</guid>
		<description>Nice. This is an old article but I&#039;m very glad to have read it now (2011). I was discussing with my Twitter friends about the environment and I suddenly remember that I have blogs about the topic but were posted a year ago. So I begin to wonder if I can actually remove the dates to make it appear still relevant. I have been using Wordpress and haven&#039;t explored if this is possible. I will also check if it can be done only on selected blogs. Anyway, thanks for this timely article (pun intended).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. This is an old article but I&#8217;m very glad to have read it now (2011). I was discussing with my Twitter friends about the environment and I suddenly remember that I have blogs about the topic but were posted a year ago. So I begin to wonder if I can actually remove the dates to make it appear still relevant. I have been using WordPress and haven&#8217;t explored if this is possible. I will also check if it can be done only on selected blogs. Anyway, thanks for this timely article (pun intended).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bang Kritikus</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-760730</link>
		<dc:creator>Bang Kritikus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-760730</guid>
		<description>Use timestamp in news to know uptodate or not a news</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use timestamp in news to know uptodate or not a news</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamdani Amin</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-568303</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamdani Amin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 06:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-568303</guid>
		<description>If the content applicable for all time then there in no point to put the date stamp.

Date however create a sense of freshness, for serious blogger, date also create a sense of urgency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the content applicable for all time then there in no point to put the date stamp.</p>
<p>Date however create a sense of freshness, for serious blogger, date also create a sense of urgency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Timeless Post a Reason in Removing Date Stamp &#187; Tech At Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-262256</link>
		<dc:creator>My Timeless Post a Reason in Removing Date Stamp &#187; Tech At Hand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 06:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-262256</guid>
		<description>[...] I have been reading some blog post of known blogger in the blogosphere and I have noticed something. When I try to see the date, I can&#8217;t find it anywhere, except from the comment section. So upon searching the reason why and what is the reason of doing this. I have seen corymiller.com post about it that he also learn from dailyblogtips.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have been reading some blog post of known blogger in the blogosphere and I have noticed something. When I try to see the date, I can&#8217;t find it anywhere, except from the comment section. So upon searching the reason why and what is the reason of doing this. I have seen corymiller.com post about it that he also learn from dailyblogtips.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W. Furst</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-208255</link>
		<dc:creator>John W. Furst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/should-we-remove-the-timestamp/#comment-208255</guid>
		<description>I have chosen to show year and month in the URI of my blog posts and the complete date in the posts. Mainly, because it helps to understand the writer&#039;s point of view better. Even timeless topics will be written differently about in different ages.

Publication date is an important criterion, whether a post or an article is useful for me or not. I strongly dislike info, that is not dated at all. Year of publication in the footer is the bare minimum, but still not good enough for fast moving topics.

&quot;Old&quot; does not mean &quot;bad&quot;, but it seems like &quot;aged (dated)&quot; material has indeed less potential for getting links and traffic. Is this because of social factors or due to the inherent structure of blogs that tend to expose recent posts more?

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have chosen to show year and month in the URI of my blog posts and the complete date in the posts. Mainly, because it helps to understand the writer&#8217;s point of view better. Even timeless topics will be written differently about in different ages.</p>
<p>Publication date is an important criterion, whether a post or an article is useful for me or not. I strongly dislike info, that is not dated at all. Year of publication in the footer is the bare minimum, but still not good enough for fast moving topics.</p>
<p>&#8220;Old&#8221; does not mean &#8220;bad&#8221;, but it seems like &#8220;aged (dated)&#8221; material has indeed less potential for getting links and traffic. Is this because of social factors or due to the inherent structure of blogs that tend to expose recent posts more?</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 11:15:35 -->
