<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What do You Think About the Liberalization of Domain Name Extentions?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:50:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Courtland</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/#comment-998501</link>
		<dc:creator>Courtland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4040#comment-998501</guid>
		<description>I think this will be very confusing. I mean, I don&#039;t want to sit in front of my computer trying to find the correct website. Why don&#039;t we just stick with the common domain extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this will be very confusing. I mean, I don&#8217;t want to sit in front of my computer trying to find the correct website. Why don&#8217;t we just stick with the common domain extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hikaye</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/#comment-916007</link>
		<dc:creator>hikaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 15:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4040#comment-916007</guid>
		<description>I really think ICANN is going too far. I’m also a domainer. I get an email about new rules and regulations every other week, if not day. Or maybe it just seems like it. It agree with every post in this thread, it’s getting to be too much. If the .com name is taken just leave it at that.

Kane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really think ICANN is going too far. I’m also a domainer. I get an email about new rules and regulations every other week, if not day. Or maybe it just seems like it. It agree with every post in this thread, it’s getting to be too much. If the .com name is taken just leave it at that.</p>
<p>Kane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medyum</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/#comment-905224</link>
		<dc:creator>Medyum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4040#comment-905224</guid>
		<description>Not much of it so far. It is hard enough to get clients to blog let alone spend 200k on a domain name extension that may or may not do anything for them at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not much of it so far. It is hard enough to get clients to blog let alone spend 200k on a domain name extension that may or may not do anything for them at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Kirt</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/#comment-903210</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Kirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4040#comment-903210</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got no idea how it&#039;s all going to turn out, but the old extensions will still be the premium and trusted options for a very long time to come amongst most internet users. It&#039;s just human nature to stick with and trust the things they know.

As for typing .porn or .whatever into the address bar... who does that? People just use Google to find something and bookmark it if they like it.

Seems like it could be a real issue when it comes to hitting the top of the SERPs and fooling people to go to a fake site when a fair bit of weight is still placed on the domain name, and now webmasters can have the same domain but a different extension to the most sought after addresses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got no idea how it&#8217;s all going to turn out, but the old extensions will still be the premium and trusted options for a very long time to come amongst most internet users. It&#8217;s just human nature to stick with and trust the things they know.</p>
<p>As for typing .porn or .whatever into the address bar&#8230; who does that? People just use Google to find something and bookmark it if they like it.</p>
<p>Seems like it could be a real issue when it comes to hitting the top of the SERPs and fooling people to go to a fake site when a fair bit of weight is still placed on the domain name, and now webmasters can have the same domain but a different extension to the most sought after addresses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Office Trainer</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/what-do-you-think-about-the-liberalization-of-domain-name-extentions/#comment-898433</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Office Trainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/?p=4040#comment-898433</guid>
		<description>Have to agree that this will only work for the big corps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree that this will only work for the big corps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 20:32:02 -->
