<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo&#8217;s Robots-Nocontent Tag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:21:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bang Kritikus</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-759980</link>
		<dc:creator>Bang Kritikus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-759980</guid>
		<description>How to edit robots.txt in blogspot ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How to edit robots.txt in blogspot ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32914</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32914</guid>
		<description>To answer your question, Keith, yes it would make it harder.  Since the robots-nocontent directive is relatively new, however, and hasn&#039;t been widely adopted (primarily because Google doesn&#039;t support it), Google might decide it&#039;s better for them to make their own standard.

On that note, if a competing directive is going to pop up, I predict it will pop up sooner rather than later.  The longer Google and MSN let Yahoo have the stage, the less likely they&#039;ll be able to compete with Yahoo&#039;s mindshare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question, Keith, yes it would make it harder.  Since the robots-nocontent directive is relatively new, however, and hasn&#8217;t been widely adopted (primarily because Google doesn&#8217;t support it), Google might decide it&#8217;s better for them to make their own standard.</p>
<p>On that note, if a competing directive is going to pop up, I predict it will pop up sooner rather than later.  The longer Google and MSN let Yahoo have the stage, the less likely they&#8217;ll be able to compete with Yahoo&#8217;s mindshare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Scocco</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32502</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Scocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32502</guid>
		<description>Keith, that is true. In fact sometimes it is a good thing that Google has such a giant market share of the search industry.

This allow them to create standards for the whole industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, that is true. In fact sometimes it is a good thing that Google has such a giant market share of the search industry.</p>
<p>This allow them to create standards for the whole industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Dsouza</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32496</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Dsouza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 23:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32496</guid>
		<description>If different search engines start having different rules wouldn&#039;t be harder for publishers like us to create content.

It would be hard if another search engine robot like that of microsoft come up with their own rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If different search engines start having different rules wouldn&#8217;t be harder for publishers like us to create content.</p>
<p>It would be hard if another search engine robot like that of microsoft come up with their own rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32362</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 18:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogtips.com/yahoos-robots-nocontent-tag/#comment-32362</guid>
		<description>Glad to be here, Daniel.  To answer your question, there&#039;s no saying when Google might adopt robots-nocontent, if at all.  Google has a strong tendency to be the search industry leader.  For example, Google invented the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sitemaps.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sitemaps protocol&lt;/a&gt; that MSN and Yahoo had to then start supporting because of its popularity.  Google may decide ignore it completely or even produce their own alternative in lieu of yielding their covetted thought leadership to Yahoo.  Only time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to be here, Daniel.  To answer your question, there&#8217;s no saying when Google might adopt robots-nocontent, if at all.  Google has a strong tendency to be the search industry leader.  For example, Google invented the <a href="http://www.sitemaps.org/" rel="nofollow">sitemaps protocol</a> that MSN and Yahoo had to then start supporting because of its popularity.  Google may decide ignore it completely or even produce their own alternative in lieu of yielding their covetted thought leadership to Yahoo.  Only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 191/192 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.dailyblogtips.com @ 2012-02-09 14:41:03 -->
