Should Your Website Have a Static or Shared IP Address?

By Daniel Scocco

Rajasekharan N. asked me the following question a couple of weeks ago:

Do you think it is better to have a shared or fixed IP address?

I confess that I didn’t know the answer right out of my head, so I went to research a bit. What I knew was that a shared IP is what you get most of the times when you sign for a shared hosting plan, and that usually you can get a static (also called fixed or dedicated) IP for a domain adding a couple of bucks to the monthly deal.

Under a shared IP address structure all the sites inside a server will have the same IP, say 212.90.80.130. Once a browser requests a page from a site inside that IP, the server will check what domain is being requested, and it will serve the correct page.

Under a static IP address structure, your site will have a unique IP that identifies it, even if it is hosted on a server with more sites.

Through my research I discovered that there is a small debate among SEOs about the influence of having a static IP address upon the search rankings of a website. Some people claim that it could actually help the rankings, but the majority agree that the sole fact of having a shared of a static IP address should not make any different at all in front of Google or other search engines.

I tend to go with the flow here, and I doubt that having a static IP per se would improve your search rankings.

There are cases where a shared IP could hurt your site though. Suppose one of the websites sharing your IP gets flagged for adult or spam content, or suffers some other strong penalty that extends to the whope IP address. Your website would inevitably suffer the consequences as well.

This is a rare situation, but it could happen.

If your website is growing fast or making a good amount of money, therefore, I think it could be a good idea to grab a dedicated IP. Just in case, as they say. I have booked one for Daily Blog Tips already.



Related Articles

Please install the YARPP plugin

Share

35 Responses to “Should Your Website Have a Static or Shared IP Address?”

  • Lowell

    I found your post after beginning my own research. This debate is new to me and I first heard about it when an SEO company wanted to by links on my sites for a client. However, they said that if I submitted more than one site to them for possible link purchases by their clients, each website needed to have a different IP? What? I have 150 domains and websites to match in multiple markets and was taken aback that I might even have to start using a dedicated server which would cost a fortune for that many domains.

    After searching the net for info, I have come to the conclusion that the ‘pros’ to having a dedicated ip for every domain and website does not justify the cost is most cases. However, it is important to be with a hosting company with good policies about what content they allow and strict enforcement against spammers.

    I agree with the comment above that if you have websites that are making big money compare to the rest, then it may not hurt to reinvest back into dedicated hosting for those websites.

  • Patrick Allmond

    This is a joke right ? I’ve never seen anybody that argues on the side of having a static IP address give a practical reason why. For performance? No. A static IP address does not give you better performance. A dedicated server (which comes with a static IP) gives you better performance.

    Listen to what google says!
    http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/myth-busting-virtual-hosts-vs-dedicated-ip-addresses/

  • Speelgoed

    Use a static IP if possible, in some cases a shared IP give problems. My website in Holland had the same IP as a Casino website. I was blocked by several filters, but it takes really a lot of time to solve the problem, but it takes a lot of time to solve it. Bram

Comments are closed.